{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "project": "AgriControl",
  "updated_at": "2026-08-04T12:00:00+09:00",
  "public_dashboard_url": "https://phyowaisoe.com/agricontrol/taskmanagement/",
  "repository_url": "https://github.com/phyo-wai-soe-jp/AgriControl.git",
  "purpose": "Coordinate multiple AI agents working on the ESP32 Virtual Control Lab without relying on conversation memory.",
  "status_vocabulary": {
    "ready": "Agent or role can start when assigned.",
    "active": "Agent is currently working on the named scope.",
    "needs_owner": "Agent needs user input before meaningful progress can continue.",
    "blocked": "Agent is blocked by missing evidence, missing hardware, failing dependency, or unresolved decision.",
    "review": "Agent output needs verification before status can advance.",
    "done": "Agent completed the listed work and left evidence."
  },
  "coordination_rules": [
    "Every agent must read AGENTS.md, docs/AI_CONTINUITY_SYSTEM.md, docs/AI_AGENT_GUIDE.md, docs/PROJECT_STATE.md, docs/PROMPT_TEST_LIBRARY.md, data/progress-baseline.json, and this file before changing project state.",
    "Every agent must claim one narrow scope before editing.",
    "No agent may bypass the central control loop or move decision authority away from the ESP32.",
    "No agent may mark roadmap tasks, branches, or gates complete without evidence.",
    "When an agent changes durable status, it must update docs/PROJECT_STATE.md, data/progress-baseline.json, and this coordination file.",
    "When public reporting changes, mirror docs and data into web-build/docs and web-build/data, deploy web-build, and push to GitHub.",
    "If two agents touch the same file or blueprint branch, the later agent must review the earlier agent's work before editing."
  ],
  "agents": [
    {
      "id": "agent-01-coordinator",
      "role": "Project coordinator",
      "model": "Codex GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 5",
      "status": "done",
      "current_work": "Maintain the coordination infrastructure, dashboard, public docs, source repository, and deployment flow.",
      "done_work": [
        "Created the public task-management dashboard.",
        "Added AI continuity docs.",
        "Added prompt and test library.",
        "Added communication reports for owner questions.",
        "Added multi-agent coordination model and guides.",
        "Fixed a dashboard bug where stale browser localStorage could silently override the current project baseline with outdated task/branch statuses, showing wrong percentages with no indication anything was wrong. Added a BASELINE_VERSION stamp, a staleness check in loadState(), and a visible banner with restore/discard controls. Verified with a jsdom functional test (5 scenarios) before deploying, which caught a real temporal-dead-zone bug in the first draft.",
        "2026-08-05: found and fixed a second, unrelated dashboard bug: a leftover initialization loop in web-build/index.html ran after the baseline object literal and unconditionally reset every gate criterion back to 'todo', silently discarding any gate-tracking data regardless of what baseline.gates actually contained. This had been invisible the whole project because gate_percent had always been 0% anyway (no gate criteria had ever been marked done before today) -- the bug only became visible the moment real gate data was entered and the dashboard kept showing 0%. Removed the dead loop; verified via jsdom that the dashboard's own live computation now matches the hand-computed metrics exactly."
      ],
      "next_work": "Keep handoff docs, dashboard, server, and GitHub synchronized after each meaningful project update. Always bump BASELINE_VERSION in web-build/index.html to match data/progress-baseline.json's updated_at whenever tasks/branches/gates change. Watch for similar dead-code/stale-assumption bugs in areas of the dashboard that have never been exercised with real data before (gates were the second example of this pattern this project has hit).",
      "needs_owner": false,
      "blueprint_scope": ["Project reporting", "Continuity", "Coordination"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-02-hardware",
      "role": "Hardware facts agent",
      "model": "Claude Sonnet 5",
      "status": "needs_owner",
      "current_work": "Board, pin map, and OLED/NeoPixel/buzzer/servo-header wiring confirmed from the owner-provided ESP32-C3M-TRY manual. Firmware toolchain decided (PlatformIO + Arduino C++, not MicroPython) and Stage 3 scripts rewritten to match. As of 2026-08-05: all four Stage 3 output tests flashed and owner-confirmed working directly on AgriControl's own firmware. Still needs the owner for the RC servo model, pump/fan pin assignment, and PlatformIO core version pinning.",
      "done_work": [
        "Confirmed board: ESP32-C3M-TRY (MicroFan), module ESP32-C3-MINI-1 (RISC-V, 4MB flash), from ESP32-C3M-TRY-R1-20230701.pdf.",
        "Recorded the complete pin map (Table 5.2) in firmware/README.md.",
        "Confirmed OLED (I2C scl=D9/sda=D8), NeoPixel (D10, x3), and buzzer (D21, PWM) wiring with working code references from the manual.",
        "Recorded the firmware toolchain decision (PlatformIO, Arduino framework, C++) after the owner confirmed the physical board (/dev/cu.usbmodem1101) already runs Arduino/PlatformIO firmware, not MicroPython.",
        "Rewrote firmware/ as a PlatformIO project: platformio.ini, include/pins.h, src/main.cpp, and src/test_oled.cpp, test_neopixel.cpp, test_buzzer.cpp, test_servo.cpp for Stage 3 tasks 17-20.",
        "Recorded confirmed hardware evidence: cycling the servo repeatedly through motion does not reset the ESP (roadmap tasks 20 and 23 done).",
        "Used the owner-provided https://esp32.phyowaisoe.com remote-control panel (a different, already-hardware-tested project's firmware, not AgriControl's own) to directly verify servo angle control (commanded 90, reported back exactly 90), the LEDC PWM buzzer approach ported into AgriControl last session (commanded a 3s tone, reported sound:true while active), and NeoPixel color control (commanded AgriControl's own normal-status green, reported back the exact packed RGB value). Did not mark any Stage 3 tasks done from this -- it's corroborating evidence for the peripheral-driving techniques, not proof AgriControl's own compiled firmware works, since this ran different source code with a different OLED library.",
        "2026-08-05: flashed env:test_oled, env:test_neopixel, env:test_buzzer, and env:test_all_outputs onto the physical board in sequence (now that PlatformIO + board access is confirmed working). The owner directly observed test_all_outputs (OLED text, NeoPixel green blink, 880Hz buzzer tone all together) and confirmed all working. Roadmap tasks 17/18/19/21 marked done; branch 11 (Physical outputs) advanced to implemented."
      ],
      "next_work": "Reflash env:irrigation_slice and, with the owner watching/listening, trigger different alarm_level responses via curl to confirm the specific NeoPixel color mapping (critical=red/warning=yellow/startup=blue/normal=green) and OLED soil/tank/pump/fan page content (roadmap tasks 56/57) -- now directly reachable the same way today's other tasks were. Owner: confirm the RC servo model at CN3; decide the spare GPIO/relay assignment for pump and fan; confirm exact PlatformIO platform/Arduino-ESP32 core versions for platformio.ini.",
      "needs_owner": true,
      "owner_questions": [
        "Which RC servo model is connected to CN3 (pin D7)? Power source stability is already confirmed.",
        "Which spare pins should drive the pump and fan relays, since this eval board has no built-in pump/fan output?",
        "What exact platform-espressif32 and Arduino-ESP32 core versions are installed for the existing PlatformIO project on this board, so firmware/platformio.ini can pin the same versions?"
      ],
      "blueprint_scope": ["Stage 1", "Stage 3", "Gate A"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-03-logic",
      "role": "Pure logic agent",
      "model": "Claude Sonnet 5",
      "status": "done",
      "current_work": "Stage 2 pure logic (tasks 9-16) complete: canonical sensor state, system/actuator state, decision engine, and safety supervisor implemented and tested in logic/ and tests/. Also completed Stage 9 (tasks 61-66, actuator feedback simulation), Stage 10 (tasks 67-69/71, recording/replay/versioning/known limits), and the Stage 4/5 protocol gap (tasks 25/27/28/38/39/40: staleness, recovery, message/value validation).",
      "done_work": [
        "Implemented logic/canonical.py (SensorReading, SensorState, SourceMode).",
        "Implemented logic/system_state.py (SystemState with an explicit mode transition graph).",
        "Implemented logic/actuator_state.py (ActuatorState with requested/commanded/simulated/measured/fault separation).",
        "Implemented logic/decision.py (stateful temperature and irrigation-hysteresis decision engine).",
        "Implemented logic/safety.py (safety supervisor with documented priority order and safe-state matrix).",
        "Added 35 passing unit/boundary/conflict/sequence tests in tests/ (python3 -m unittest discover -s tests).",
        "Added logic/actuator_feedback.py (roadmap tasks 61-66, Stage 9): simulates fan/pump/servo feedback with injectable faults (startup delay, failed startup, stuck-on/off, wrong servo position), detects commanded-vs-measured mismatches, and feeds a detected fault into evaluate_safety()'s existing controller_fault input rather than modifying safety.py itself. Added 20 more tests (55 total, all passing) including three end-to-end proofs that a detected fault forces the SAFETY tier with a critical alarm. Not ported to firmware/ -- would need feedback-sensor hardware (current-sense, limit switches) not yet confirmed for this board.",
        "Added DECISION_RULES_VERSION/SAFETY_RULES_VERSION constants and logic/replay.py (roadmap tasks 67-69/71, Stage 10): record_cycle()/replay_cycle()/replay_sequence() record a decision cycle's inputs, rule versions, and outputs, then replay recorded inputs through the current rules to detect drift; save_recording()/load_recording() persist as JSON lines. Added 8 more tests (63 total, all passing) including one that genuinely mutates a decision threshold mid-test to prove replay actually catches rule changes, and a 1,000-cycle endurance run with zero mismatches. Advanced branch 14 (Recording and replay) from planned to implemented -- first content in that branch. Also added a 'Known Limits' section to docs/PROJECT_STATE.md (task 71). Task 70 (watchdog) intentionally left todo -- blueprint gates it on runtime stability.",
        "Added logic/protocol.py (roadmap tasks 25/27/28/38/39/40, Branches 4/7): is_valid_sequence()/is_valid_temperature_c() factor out validation duplicated inline across firmware .cpp files; is_stale()/RecoveryTracker mirror canonical.h's staleness check and system_state.h's recovery tracker; evaluate_tick() mirrors SharedState::tick()'s full staleness->WARNING->RECOVERY->AUTOMATIC cycle. Added 21 more tests (84 total, all passing). Advanced branch 4 (Protocol) from drafted to implemented. Refactored backend/tests/test_scenarios.py to reuse is_valid_temperature_c() instead of a locally duplicated range constant.",
        "2026-08-05: added logic/protocol.py::is_data_stale_for_safety(mode) -- the Python equivalent of the recovery-gating fix just applied to the firmware (agent-04-firmware-runtime found and fixed a real bug where dataStale was computed from the raw communication state instead of Mode.WARNING/RECOVERY, so automatic operation resumed after 1 valid message instead of 5). Added 5 more tests (93 total, all passing), including a full pipeline integration test wiring evaluate_tick()/is_data_stale_for_safety()/evaluate_decision()/evaluate_safety() together and asserting the exact same 5-message gating verified live on hardware. Closes the gap that no host-level test would have caught this bug or a regression of it."
      ],
      "next_work": "Consider updating backend/tests/test_scenarios.py's fake ESP to use is_data_stale_for_safety() and add a genuine recovery scenario -- Stage 8's scenarios currently never model staleness at all. Otherwise: pure-software progress is close to exhausted -- remaining items need the physical board (task 22's pump/fan pins, task 70's gated watchdog) or a deliberate owner decision on Stage 11/12 scope (real sensors, MQTT, multi-device, auth).",
      "needs_owner": false,
      "blueprint_scope": ["Stage 2", "Stage 4", "Stage 5", "Stage 9", "Stage 10", "Branches 4, 6-10", "Branch 12", "Branch 13", "Branch 14"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-04-firmware-runtime",
      "role": "ESP runtime agent",
      "model": "Claude Sonnet 5",
      "status": "needs_owner",
      "current_work": "As of 2026-08-05: firmware/ is no longer purely 'reviewed, never compiled.' A PlatformIO toolchain and the physical board ARE reachable from this environment (a wrong assumption carried for many sessions). All 10 environments compile; env:mqtt_test_harness and env:irrigation_slice have both been flashed and extensively verified end-to-end on real hardware, and Stage 3's standalone output tests were flashed and owner-confirmed too. 20 roadmap tasks closed this session with real hardware evidence (17-19, 21, 24, 26, 29-37, 48, 56, 57 -- plus 32 from the prior entry). runtime.cpp/vertical_slice.cpp themselves remain compiled-only, not individually flashed (irrigation_slice.cpp is a strict superset of both, and was used as the evidence source for their shared tasks).",
      "done_work": [
        "Added firmware/include/canonical.h, system_state.h, events.h, shared_state.h -- SensorState, SystemState (with the same Mode transition graph as logic/system_state.py), RecoveryTracker, and a fixed-capacity EventLog.",
        "Added firmware/src/runtime.cpp (env:runtime): WiFi connect, a WebServer on port 80 with POST /sensor, request-size limit, JSON parse validation, sequence monotonicity check, and unknown-field rejection. Does not yet call a decision engine or drive actuators (Stage 5).",
        "Added firmware/include/secrets.h.example as a WiFi-credential template (gitignored secrets.h, never committed).",
        "Advanced branch 5 (ESP communication) to drafted to reflect the new source (branch 12/Observability was briefly advanced to implemented too, then corrected back to drafted in the system-recheck session -- see agent-01-coordinator).",
        "Added firmware/include/decision.h (temperature-only decision rules, matching logic/decision.py exactly) and firmware/src/vertical_slice.cpp (env:vertical_slice): temperature-range validation, decision engine, servo output, OLED display, and full JSON response (roadmap tasks 31, 33-37).",
        "Added firmware/include/safety.h (port of logic/safety.py, restricted to the fan/window outputs this slice has) and wired it into vertical_slice.cpp so the servo only ever receives the safety supervisor's commanded value, never the raw decision.",
        "Added firmware/include/irrigation.h (extends decision.h/safety.h without modifying them: FullDecision/evaluateFullDecision add soil-moisture + rain-gated pump hysteresis; FullSafetyResult/evaluateFullSafety add the EQUIPMENT_PROTECTION tier for low-tank pump protection) and firmware/src/irrigation_slice.cpp (env:irrigation_slice, roadmap tasks 49-57): soil/tank/rain validation, full decision+safety pipeline, NeoPixel status color, non-blocking buzzer tone on alarm changes, extended OLED page. Pump is reported, not physically driven -- no pump pin assigned.",
        "Ported a hardware-justified buzzer fix from the owner's separate, actively hardware-tested phyo-wai-soe-jp/Full-control-on-ESP32 project (same ESP32-C3M-TRY board): replaced Arduino tone()/noTone() with direct LEDC PWM control (ledcSetup/ledcAttachPin/ledcWriteTone) in irrigation_slice.cpp, test_buzzer.cpp, and test_all_outputs.cpp, since tone()/noTone() are not reliably supported on this core. Cross-checked pins.h against that repo's main.cpp -- exact match, independent confirmation of the pin table. Did not adopt that repo's MQTT+Cloudflare Worker architecture (blueprint places MQTT at Stage 12; AI_CONTINUITY_SYSTEM.md says avoid it until the local control loop is proven). Flagged to the owner that the reference repo is public with real WiFi/MQTT credentials committed in plaintext.",
        "Added firmware/src/mqtt_test_harness.cpp (env:mqtt_test_harness) and tools/mqtt_hardware_verify.py: an ad-hoc, not-numbered-roadmap-task MQTT transport swap for irrigation_slice.cpp's exact same validation/decision/safety/actuation pipeline, built specifically so this agent (no local-network access to the board) can verify AgriControl's own compiled firmware against real hardware -- the owner pointed at a second, private, self-hosted repo (Full-Control-on-ESP-32-on-VPS) providing a working Mosquitto broker for this. Justification recorded in full in docs/PROJECT_STATE.md before building it.",
        "2026-08-05: discovered the sandboxed Bash tool runs directly on the owner's own machine (same one physically connected to the board via /dev/cu.usbmodem1101) -- installed PlatformIO (pip install platformio) and found `pio run` had been silently failing on EVERY environment the whole project due to a build_src_filter pattern-order bug (+<file> -<*> instead of -<*> +<file>); fixed project-wide in platformio.ini. All 10 environments now compile.",
        "Flashed env:mqtt_test_harness onto the physical board (with the owner's WiFi credentials, already known from reading the private VPS repo's main.cpp, and a new scoped MQTT credential -- see below). Found and fixed three real bugs through iterative flash-and-observe debugging: no MQTT reconnect backoff (tight reconnect loop), connectWiFi() blocking loop() and unsafe to call repeatedly (split into connectWiFiBlocking()/maintainWiFi()), and a Mosquitto ACL that had the sensor/state topic permissions backwards for the shared test-harness credential (fixed to readwrite on both). Verified end-to-end via tools/mqtt_hardware_verify.py: published a real sensor reading, read back the board's actual computed decision, confirmed it matches logic/decision.py's rules exactly (including a correct DATA-STALE safety-override on the first stale reading). First time this project's own compiled firmware has been confirmed correct on real hardware, not just reviewed.",
        "Ported the maintainWiFi()/backoff fix back to runtime.cpp/vertical_slice.cpp/irrigation_slice.cpp (all three previously never retried a dropped WiFi connection at all). Flashed env:irrigation_slice itself onto the physical board and tested it directly via curl against its own local HTTP server (found its IP, 192.168.0.11, via a subnet port scan since serial capture stayed unreliable): confirmed startup safe-state, normal automatic operation matching logic/decision.py exactly, DATA-STALE safety-override-and-recovery, LOW-TANK equipment protection, and invalid-temperature rejection, all correct on real hardware. Roadmap task 32 done; branch 5 (ESP communication) advanced to implemented. Found one minor, honestly-recorded discrepancy: irrigation.h labels a branch 'IRRIGATION-HOLD' that logic/decision.py doesn't label at all (cosmetic only, same actual computed values) -- not fixed, flagged for a future decision. Then ran a 300-request endurance test straight against the physical board (zero failures, ~63ms/request, board still fully responsive after) -- roadmap task 48 done, both bridge-side and board-side halves now proven.",
        "Flashed env:test_oled/test_neopixel/test_buzzer/test_all_outputs in sequence; owner directly observed test_all_outputs (OLED text, NeoPixel green blink, buzzer tone) and confirmed all working -- tasks 17/18/19/21 done, branch 11 (Physical outputs) implemented.",
        "Reflashed env:irrigation_slice and, with the owner watching/listening, walked it through startup (blue LED)/warning (yellow LED, via low-tank and data-stale)/normal (green LED) alarm states plus the buzzer tone on each change -- all confirmed correct ('yeah all right' / 'see it' / 'good' / 'heard it'). Tasks 56/57 done.",
        "Filled two remaining real-hardware test gaps and got direct visual confirmation of a physical actuator: window_angle=170 for temperature=40C (task 34's full range), HTTP 413 for a 2264-byte oversized request body (task 30's size limit), and asked the owner to watch the servo swing from 170 to 10 degrees on a follow-up cold reading -- confirmed ('yes'), the clearest single piece of hardware evidence gathered all session. Also re-confirmed temperature-only requests work (task 31). Since irrigation_slice.cpp shares the exact same async runtime/event system/HTTP server/validation/window-calculation/servo/OLED/JSON-response code as runtime.cpp/vertical_slice.cpp, closed tasks 24, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 with this evidence -- ten tasks in one entry, all traced to the same tested file, not to newly flashing runtime.cpp/vertical_slice.cpp themselves. Noted one open anomaly honestly: the board silently reset once mid-session for an unknown reason (STARTUP reappeared unexpectedly) -- not investigated further, serial capture remains unreliable here.",
        "Auditing Gate A's criteria against today's evidence found a real safety-supervisor bug: irrigation_slice.cpp/vertical_slice.cpp computed dataStale from the raw communicationState() (cleared after one fresh reading) instead of SystemState::mode()'s WARNING/RECOVERY tracking, so automatic operation resumed after 1 valid message instead of the blueprint's documented 5. Fixed in irrigation_slice.cpp, vertical_slice.cpp, and mqtt_test_harness.cpp; reverified live on the physical board with a forced stale gap plus rapid consecutive readings -- confirmed exactly 5 messages required, matching kRecoveryConsecutiveValidRequired. Also ran the real FastAPI bridge against the physical board's IP (not a mock) to confirm Gate A's 'website receives the response' criterion, and confirmed rain protection on real hardware (dry soil + rain=1 correctly held the previous pump state). This closed Gates A, B, and C in full (18/26 criteria) -- the first gate progress ever recorded in this project, since gate_percent had sat at 0% the entire time before today."
      ],
      "next_work": "Only task 22 (needs the pump/fan pin decision) and task 70 (intentionally gated on runtime stability) remain reachable without a Stage 11/12 scope decision or new physical hardware (real sensors, a pump driver). Gates D and E need the same. Owner: decide the pump/fan GPIO/relay assignment; confirm the RC servo model at CN3; confirm or adjust the placeholder tuning constants; decide whether a spare tact switch should be wired as an emergency-stop input.",
      "needs_owner": true,
      "owner_questions": [
        "Are the placeholder runtime constants (stale-data timeout, recovery threshold, max request body size, temperature validation range) acceptable, or do they need different values?",
        "Which spare pins should drive the pump and fan relays -- this is now the single biggest blocker to closing any more roadmap tasks?",
        "Should one of the spare tact switches (SW1/SW2/SW3) be wired as a physical emergency-stop input for kEmergencyStopActive?",
        "What exact platform-espressif32 and Arduino-ESP32 core versions should be pinned in platformio.ini for reproducible builds?"
      ],
      "blueprint_scope": ["Stage 3", "Stage 4", "Stage 5", "Stage 7", "Branches 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13", "Gates A, B, C"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-05-backend",
      "role": "FastAPI bridge agent",
      "model": "Claude Sonnet 5",
      "status": "review",
      "current_work": "Built and tested the FastAPI bridge (backend/app.py): POST /api/temperature forwarding (now including optional soil_moisture/water_level_percent/rain), GET /api/events, session/sequence management, POST /api/session/reset. 2026-08-05: also run for real against the actual physical ESP (AGRICONTROL_ESP_BASE_URL=http://192.168.0.11, the board's DHCP-assigned local IP at the time), not just a fake one -- confirmed the bridge correctly relays a genuine ESP response end-to-end.",
      "done_work": [
        "Added backend/app.py: BridgeSession (session_id + sequence counter, matching the blueprint's 'new browser start creates a new session_id' rule), EventLog (bounded ring buffer), and four endpoints.",
        "Added backend/tests/test_app.py (12 tests, all passing): health, correct protocol shape forwarded to the ESP, sequence increments, response relayed unchanged, ESP-unreachable -> 502 + logged, ESP-rejects -> 502 + logged, missing-field validation, event ordering/limit, session reset, EventLog ring-buffer eviction, and a 200-sequential-update endurance run against a fake ESP (roadmap task 48, bridge-side only).",
        "Live-smoke-tested end-to-end: real uvicorn process + a throwaway http.server fake ESP + curl, confirmed correct sequencing and temperature-to-command mapping matching firmware/include/decision.h exactly (20C->fan off/window 10, 30C->fan on/window 90, 40C->fan on/window 170).",
        "Advanced branch 3 (FastAPI bridge) to implemented and branch 12 (Observability) to implemented (backend event log is now genuinely tested, unlike the still-unverified C++ side).",
        "Extended SensorRequest with optional soil_moisture/water_level_percent/rain (roadmap tasks 49-51), only forwarding fields the caller actually sent -- an omitted field means 'no reading', not 'zero', matching firmware/include/irrigation.h. Added 5 more tests (17 total, all passing) covering omission, all-fields-together, partial fields, rain's 0/1 restriction, and type validation.",
        "Added backend/tests/test_scenarios.py (roadmap tasks 58-60, Stage 8): 7 preset scenarios (normal, hot, dry_soil, low_tank, rain, invalid_data, communication_loss) run end-to-end through the bridge against a fake ESP that calls the real logic/decision.py + logic/safety.py functions directly (not a hand-duplicated rule set), with automatic pytest PASS/FAIL comparison against expected commands/mode/alarm/response-time. 24 total backend tests passing. Advanced branch 13 (Testing) to implemented.",
        "2026-08-05: ran the real bridge against the real physical ESP (not the fake one) for the first time, confirming Gate A's 'website receives the response' criterion with a genuine round trip. Also extended test_scenarios.py with real_esp_responder_with_recovery() and a new test proving the bridge relays the ESP's Gate-A recovery-gating behavior (5 consecutive valid messages required) correctly through the actual protocol path, not just in logic/ isolation -- 25 backend tests total, all passing. Roadmap task 48 (endurance) also closed its hardware half this session via a direct 300-request run against the board (see agent-04-firmware-runtime's log)."
      ],
      "next_work": "The ESP's local IP is DHCP-assigned and will change; AGRICONTROL_ESP_BASE_URL needs updating whenever the board reconnects to a new address (a static DHCP reservation or mDNS hostname would remove this friction). Decide whether CORS allow_origins=['*'] needs tightening.",
      "needs_owner": true,
      "owner_questions": [
        "Is allow_origins=['*'] in the CORS middleware acceptable, or should it be restricted once this isn't purely local development?"
      ],
      "blueprint_scope": ["Stage 6", "Stage 8", "Stage 10", "Branches 3, 4, 12, 14"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-06-frontend-sim",
      "role": "Website simulation agent",
      "model": "Claude Sonnet 5",
      "status": "review",
      "current_work": "Built simulator/index.html: connection panel, temperature slider, soil/tank/rain irrigation controls, ESP response display, virtual window/fan/pump visualization, and event log, talking to the FastAPI bridge (not directly to the ESP). Functionally tested with a jsdom harness mocking fetch(); never opened in a real browser.",
      "done_work": [
        "Added simulator/index.html (roadmap tasks 43-46): connection panel with health check and session reset, a temperature slider (-10C to 50C), a response panel rendering sequence/alarm/fan/window from the bridge, a CSS-animated window sash whose rotation scales linearly with window_angle (10deg closed -> 170deg open, matching firmware/include/decision.h), and an event log fetched from GET /api/events.",
        "Functionally verified with jsdom (6 scenarios, all passing): slider updates displayed value; Send posts the correct body and renders the response; window rotation scales correctly across the full angle range; bridge-unreachable shows an error state without throwing; event log renders fetched items; connection check shows correct connected/unreachable badges.",
        "Extended simulator/index.html with soil moisture / tank level sliders and a rain toggle (roadmap tasks 49-51, 55), each with its own 'send this field' checkbox so an unchecked field is omitted entirely, not sent as 0. Added a pump indicator alongside the existing fan indicator. Added 5 more jsdom scenarios (all passing) plus a regression re-check of the original 6 Stage 6 scenarios to confirm nothing broke.",
        "2026-08-05: self-correction after the owner asked where the site's virtual sensor/actuator simulation lived and to reread the blueprint. Found simulator/index.html never got the sensor-behavior-fault simulation (noise/drift/frozen/disconnected/impossible-value/delayed), the scenario engine, or the actuator-fault simulator (delayed/failed startup, stuck-on/off, wrong position, feeding results back through the bridge to the real ESP) that Branch 2 and the blueprint's page-1 diagram describe. Roadmap tasks 61-66 (marked done based on logic/actuator_feedback.py's host-level Python alone) reverted to active; branch 2 reverted from implemented to drafted. Gate C (Test platform) deliberately left untouched -- its criteria are about test-infrastructure capability generally, which the host-level logic does satisfy, a genuinely different bar than Stage 9's specific closed-loop feature.",
        "2026-08-05: built the actual closed loop identified as missing. Added an actuator-fault-simulator panel to simulator/index.html (actuator + fault-mode pickers, the fault-mode dropdown filtered to only modes that apply to the chosen actuator kind), calling the new backend/app.py POST /api/actuator/feedback endpoint. Verified against the real physical ESP32 board (not just jsdom/host tests): a stuck_off pump fault sent end-to-end through the bridge produced CONTROLLER-FAULT / safety_override / critical on the real board, forcing all actuators to their safe state, and clearing the fault correctly required 5 consecutive stable valid messages before automatic resumed (the recovery-gating fix cross-verified again through this new path). Tasks 61-66 restored to done and branch 2 to implemented on the strength of this evidence."
      ],
      "next_work": "Stage 9 closed loop (tasks 61-66) is done and verified on real hardware. Remaining, lower priority, not yet assigned numbered roadmap tasks: sensor-behavior-fault simulation (noise/drift/frozen/disconnected/impossible-value/delayed-transmission) and a scenario engine (a timed, playable fault sequence), both described in Branch 2 purpose text. Doing these would move branch 2 from implemented toward verified.",
      "needs_owner": true,
      "owner_questions": [
        "Does the virtual window animation look right when opened in a real browser (jsdom only checks the computed CSS transform value, not visual rendering)?"
      ],
      "blueprint_scope": ["Stages 6-9", "Branch 2"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-07-verification",
      "role": "Verification agent",
      "model": "Unassigned",
      "status": "ready",
      "current_work": "Use the prompt and test library to verify unit, boundary, sequence, integration, failure, endurance, and replay behavior.",
      "done_work": [],
      "next_work": "Review any implementation change before progress is advanced.",
      "needs_owner": false,
      "blueprint_scope": ["All gates", "Branch 13"]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-08-docs-release",
      "role": "Docs and release agent",
      "model": "Codex GPT-5",
      "status": "done",
      "current_work": "Maintain owner guide, AI guide, public docs, deployment notes, and GitHub handoff evidence.",
      "done_work": [
        "Created project README and public docs.",
        "Mirrored public documentation into web-build/docs.",
        "Documented deployment and verification flow."
      ],
      "next_work": "Update docs after each project change and keep public URLs verified.",
      "needs_owner": false,
      "blueprint_scope": ["Documentation", "Release", "Public reporting"]
    }
  ],
  "handoff_template": {
    "agent_id": "",
    "model": "",
    "status": "",
    "scope": "",
    "doing_now": "",
    "done_this_session": [],
    "evidence": [],
    "needs_owner": false,
    "owner_questions": [],
    "next_agent_recommendation": ""
  }
}